1 The Motor is The Catalyst | 2 The Generator is Free Mechanical Energy | 3 Power Recovery Circuit | 4 « Back to The Debunkified Channel |

The Motor is The Catalyst

Really if you think about it perpetual motion is just a word, and maybe interpreted as a machine that is running itself or charging it's own battery to run itself forever and that can run off it's own power supply or output. This is impossible, however everything is already in a state of perpetual motion. It is often said that if this could be done, then this would be known as the "Holy Grail" of physics.

After many years of seeking answers to free energy, I found out the real difficulty in finding any real answers on the internet. There are answers, but they are half truths and often the information isn't open sourced and is protected by being proprietary. I always wished somebody would have provided a simplistic explanation on how to achieve perpetual motion all in one place, without bits and pieces of the real answers and truth scattered all over the web like a giant jig saw puzzle. An answer that is provided all in one place. A way that could simply explain how a device or machine can move itself and keep itself going forever. Something that narrowed it all down and could allow the building of such a device, without the constant sifting through of various devices, patents, and machines over and over again day after day. So it is my hope that I have done just that here.

Perpetual motion is found everywhere in nature, an atom with the electrons spinning in orbit around the nucleus, the earth spinning around it's star (Our sun), and so forth. As newton put it, an object in motion, tends to stay in motion unless acted upon by an outside source. So in this case a motor has all sorts of losses, resistive losses in the coil resistance, which is inevitable, air friction, gravity friction, and friction in the bearings and then of course bemf, which in this case has been turned around to act as an advantage, not a hinderance. These frictions are very small losses and there is more than enough energy to compensate for the losses, therefore boosting the energy well over 100% and into overunity ranges also known as free energy.

It is impossible to generate more energy in a system than what it consumes. If this were true then the device would be running in overunity mode and would be over 100% efficient which is impossible. However it is completely possible to generate more energy than what the device consumes if the local enviroment is involved or some other energy that is outside of the system which can be drawn or attracted into the system. Namely the the power of magnets and how to unlock it's hidden power and potential will be discussed.

A system may only appear as perpetual motion and may appear as if it's charging it's own battery or running itself if the observer doesn't understand the "how" or "why" it is doing so or where the extra energy is coming from. This extra energy maybe hidden from the view of the observer because it is outside of the system, not from within it and not well understood. The device in question is really actually drawing in the extra energy into the system from outside of the system. I would like to emphasize that it is important that there is energy outside of the system that is available to be drawn into the system. In this way we can get a system to self sustain once the energy outside of the system is realized and understood.

In the case that is currently being spoken of, the source of energy is very simplistic, and that is the magnetic field of a magnet. This can be considered a natural source of energy from the earth in the form of magnetite, but it is sometimes difficult to understand how to unlock the hidden power of a magnet and make it do real work and produce useable amounts of current and power, even above the amount used to power the whole thing.

Often the terms zero point energy, radiant energy, aether, cosmic energy, dark energy and antigravity are spoken of in the free energy field. These all represent basically the same concept. It is often said that we are surrounded in a vast sea of seething energy and that we can tap into this universal power that surrounds us. However it is somewhat difficult to understand exactly what that means and how to create a device that taps such a field.

So I will explain it right here in simplistic terms that a layman can understand. To make it easy, Einstein said that mass is equal to energy, that means we are mass therefore we are energy! The fact that we are surrounded by a reality that mainly consists of mass that we can physically see, can only mean we are surrounded by energy! I believe this is what is meant by the phrase that has been mentioned before "We are surrounded by a vast sea of seething energy"!

So how does this relate to a device or machine that can do this? Well magnets come from the earth, and magnets are a piece of our reality that is made up of mass or simply energy. The problem is man has had a hard time grasping the concept of how to sucessfully tap the energy we all know that it contains. Magnets are made of magnetite and is a rock that comes from the earth, therefore we can safely say that the magnet is a source of "natural" energy that the earth supplys, so we will use this form of enviromental energy as our energy that lies outside of the system that we will be building and we will refer to it as point "B" of the system.

One type of free energy device is a solar cell, in which it receives sunlight and then converts it into useable electricity. We don't even have to input any energy into that system to run it, instead it just sits there and receives the free energy contained in sunlight. Even though the solar cell is just a mere 10% efficient or so, it still receives free energy from the sun, therefore boosting the efficiency well above 100%. In this instance the sun is the source of free energy. The electromagnetic device that will be discussed is based upon this principle in a similar fashion. The only difference is that we have to input a little bit of energy.

The concept is actually pretty easy. In fact it's the easiest thing in the world. What's not so easy is the building of the device, it is difficult but not impossible. I have divided the concept into three different categories that I will label steps. Let's begin with the simple pulse motor. For starters, let's use the simple Bedini Model. But first let me say, that you CAN NOT RELY on the Bedini principle alone for perpetual motion, honestly it just doesn't work.

But for simplicity's sake we will only use the Bedini model as a simple illustration for a simple pulse motor for the subject matter at hand, because that's all it is. But I will show you the hidden potential and what more can be done with that design, something Bedini never bothered to even mention in fact he didn't bother to mention very much at all, and I think as smart as he was, he didn't really show us much of anything. For instance he claimed the back EMF or what is commonly known as the kick back spike, bemf, or counter EMF was the source of free energy. I'm sorry but it's not, in fact that energy is only 30 to 45% efficient. But we will continue to use it, because it helps, I will explain further here in a while.

How long did man sit next to a stream before he invented the paddle wheel?

First let me begin with magnetic fields. In a simple pulse motor, you have a power source, the battery. This power then is pulsed on and switched through the coil, which then of course produces an electromagnetic field which then repulses or attracts another magnetic field on a spinning rotor, depending on how you have it set up. Here's where all the secrets lie, in between those magnetic fields. This is where the system can tap energy from another system outside of the first, and can appear to be part of the system, this is what we want to do.

Normally power is transferred from load to source, such as from battery to load, and it appears as if the energy is used up and therefore the power is drained and the battery eventually dies a slow death. Then we have to spend money just to do it all over again. So energy is transferred from point A to point B, in a closed loop or circuit. This part is perfectly normal and in fact we want to do this at the beginning of the process, for we need energy at the beginning of the system at point A to tap more energy at point B. So this is what the motor does.

So we begin with a power source (A battery) which sends a current flowing through the coil which makes the magnetic field. The coil is just a load. But it is a special kind of load. It is a load that creates another special kind of energy. A magnetic field! It is true that this magnetic field is just the energy that was once flowing through the coil, and now has simply been transformed into a magnetic field. These are ordinary transforming rules. The law of conservation of energy still holds true here. As we all know you can't create nor destroy energy, but can only transform it, therefore abiding to the law of conservation of energy, meaning you can not get more energy out of a system than what has been put into it.

1 The Motor is The Catalyst | 2 The Generator is Free Mechanical Energy | 3 Power Recovery Circuit

The Generator is Free Mechanical Energy

But here's the secret. This is how point A in the system breaks away from point B and allows another system from outside to come into play. When that magnetic field repulses or attracts the magnetic field on the rotor, it does NOT have anything to do with the energy powering the coil and making the magnetic field around that coil. At first sight, one would think that there is energy tranfer going on in between the produced magnetic field and the rotor magnetic field that is now moving in motion. So it would be reasonable to think that we have simply transferred power from the battery to the rotor to make it spin. Ah, but not so. Here, let me explain.

We have only transferred power from the battery to the coil, not from the battery to the rotor or even from the coil to the rotor. The rotor that has just been repulsed, is now in motion, that motion is energy and power. Any spinning mass stores energy similar to how a capacitor stores potential. Once the power has been transferred to the coil, that's where it ends.

The spinning energy stored now in the rotor is now referred to as mechanical energy, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the power we used to produce the field that causes the mechanical rotation. That electromagnetic field we produced from battery power is still there! It HAS NOT BEEN USED UP BY THE ROTOR! NOR HAS IT BEEN TRANSFERRED TO THE ROTOR! And so as a result mechanical energy is produced. So then here is a rare case in which the cause has an effect but the effect does not reflect back to the cause!

Normally it has been thought that for every action there is an opposite and equal reaction, an effect for every cause. Well this holds true here, but there is something special that happens here, an added extra benefit.

Here's another illustration that will hopefully show the truth in this. Take two magnets. Face them towards one another with like poles, for instance North and North. They will try to repulse one another. Now force them together as close as possible. Now move them apart and set them down on the table in front of you. What happened to the magnetic fields? Nothing! They are still there! They didn't vanish or nothing mysterious happened. They simply interacted with each other, and that's about it. What I would like to emphasize here is that one field can be made to do work, which takes a force to do, but when the other field produces work as a result, IT DOES NOT CONSUME the power or force we first initially applied. IT DOES NOT CONSUME THE MAGNETIC FIELD THAT WE PRODUCED.

You can push, pull, move and smash the two individual magnetic poles in every possible way, but they will not effect each other. They can be manipulated in any way you wish, but when you're done doing all of that guess what?, they are still there, they haven't budged not one bit at all. The same thing is occuring between an electromagnetic field that we produce with power, and a natural magnetic field from the earth. They both remain like a rock (No pun intended, lol)

So let's look at this from the beginning. For the sake of simplicity let's leave the rotor out for right now. We start with a power source. We will use a battery for example. We turn on a switch and allow power to flow from the battery and through the load, which is an electromagnetic coil. Current travels through the coil of wire and produces an electromagnetic field around the coil. Let's say we use .100 mA to do this with. We then turn the switch off. The electromagnetic field then collapses and returns back to a current, at say just 30 or 45% efficiency.

Ok, now we repeat that exact same thing, but this time we're going to add the rotor. The exact same .100 mA is used. But now we have an extra benefit. That .100 mA of power is transformed into the same electromagnetic field, but now it is pushing on a magnetic field on the rotor, and extra mechanical energy is produced. The magnetic field that we produced is still there! Nothing has changed, and it remains just like before. We now turn the switch off, the field collapses as usual at only 35 to 45% efficiency, but, here's the kicker, we are left with the result of a rotor that is now spinning mechanically! That mechanical rotation is spinning mass and storing energy! It has nothing to do with the power we used to produce the magnetic field to push the rotor around.

This can be likened to the pushing of a swing in small impulses. The rotor doesn't consume anything. It doesn't consume or use up the magnetic field produced by the battery power in any way at all. It is in fact a free mechanical load! The rotor is spinning for free, and the spinning mass is storing energy, for free. It is indeed a free source of energy. Now all that has to be done is to convert that free mechanical energy back to electrical energy. How do we do that? With generator coils of course.

So this is how we can literally harness the power locked up inside of magnets and utilize them to do substantial work and do something practical. In reality if you think about it, in order to generate electricity we simply take a moving magnetic field and move it past a conductor, such as a coil and then produce electricity. The more wire we have the more we will produce. We can do this from a single magnetic field. So we can now take our free mechanical energy and convert it to free electrical energy.

So now not only do we have one natural form of locked up energy in a magnetic field from the earth we now introduce another form of enviromental energy from the earth containing electrons in copper wire! We just now simply make them work together to produce work, and that work is completley free because both are outside of the system now, separated by two magnetic fields, one at point "A" of the system and the other at point "B" of the system that is broken away and separate from point "A" and doesn't reflect back to point "A", this is the division that makes our energy now free.

For example, let's say we have one magnet, and it is spinning past a coil with let's say 100 turns on it and we produce, say 1 watt. But there's still room left to add more wire within that same magnetic flux field. Ok, so we add 100 more turns of wire, and now we have the flux field completely engulfing the entire coil of now 200 turns. We will now generate 2 watts. You see? So the more mass we are rotating, for example a bigger diameter rotor that can hold more magnets on it, the more mechanical energy we will have and the more points around the perimeter of that rotor we can tap energy off of.

1 The Motor is The Catalyst | 2 The Generator is Free Mechanical Energy | 3 Power Recovery Circuit

Power Recovery Circuit

You maybe wondering ok, what about the Lenz's Law drag produced when trying to harness all that generated power? Often people will figure out that they have the ability to produce massive amounts of power, and they intuitively know that they are producing powers that far exceed the power that is being consumed, yet when they go try to harness this generated power, they end up losing it all and then say well, I guess it just can't be done. Often the generated power will be placed directly to a load, which of course luggs the rotor down, and makes input current go up! Not good.

For energy recovery we use capacitors. Plain and simple. A capacitor will act like a load without hardly any resistance at all. However, there will always we a resistance in everything, including a capacitor and it's hard to avoid. If we were to just stick all that generated power straight to a load, there will be a major lugging of the rotor and it will slow down, of course, therefore dwindling away our freshly made generated power. How do you avoid this Lenz's Law drag? By using a capacitor, you rectify the coil power into DC with a full wave bridge rectifier, fill the capacitor up, then get some kind of timing switch and dump back to the source (The battery). Below is a picture of what I am coining as "Rectified Tuned LC Tank Circuit For Energy Recovery."

Normally by sticking the generated power directly to a normal load, such as a light bulb, will cause the rotor to slow down because of opposing fields dictated by Lenz's Law. We want the rotor to maintain it's speed, because of course that's where all our generated power lies. Speed equals power. It's because of all the resistance in the load, it will close the loop and kill the energy. While a capacitor will act more like an invisible load of sorts, with a very small resistance. There will always be a slight drag from filling any capacitor from empty, but it is negligible, and it doesn't take very long at all for the rotor to speed back up once the capacitor is filled up, until the next dump.

Remember that pretty much all pulse motors will achieve a state of resonance in which once the highest RPM's or speed has been achieved, the current draw will be at it's lowest. As the current draw will be at it's lowest, the rotor will be at it's highest speed therefore the greatest amount of free mechanical power can be achieved which then of course is converted directly to the highest electrical power possible given that the correct energy extracting methods are utilized.

So I will leave the rest of the details to you as far as designs are concerned. Any number of different types of styles can be created. You can use metal cores, air cores, ferrite magnets, neodymium magnets, one rotor, multiple rotors, coils with thick or thin magnet wire, whatever you wish it's all up to you now.

Note: This is not the same thing as Bedini's old flip-flop circuit controller. It is vastly different in many different aspects. For instance his claim of sling-shotting ions in the electrolyte of a battery with high voltage in order to oscillate them and therefore draw in energy from the enviroment and produce free current does not hold true here.

I must iterate, here the controller is similar but not exactly the same and serves a completely different purpose. It is NOT used to pulse the battery with high voltage.

The reason for the the flip flop in this particular scenario is just in case you are using Hall Commutating or some other type of commutating in which there is only one power wire in the motor coil. If that is the case then this circuit is perfect for separating the power (out and away) from the circuit so there is no conflicts in currents, like currents flowing backwards and producing an unwanted discharge of the battery. In this way power can be pulse discharged from the capacitor and dumped back into it's own battery. Notice that two opto-couplers are being switched on and off alternately to switch two different solid state relay switches that they are part of.

If using Bedini's bifilar or even trifilar coil configuration, then power can be separated out and away with the use of the trifilar directly back to it's own battery or another battery, then there is no need for a capacitor.

The purpose of the flip flop here is somewhat similar to Bedini's circuit in that one side of the flip flop disconnects the motor from the battery while the other side connects the alternator, generator, magneto, energizer, or whatever you wish to call it, back to it's own source, only if you're using a switching scheme in which there is only one wire, the power wire. In this way power can be sent back to the one and only battery.

Really, there was no need for a flip flop or mechanical switch on the shaft of bedini's original motor/generator in his 1984 book. Why? There's no point. You won't get a self charging battery because you're slamming the battery with high voltage, all that does is destroy the battery. And if you ever do find the frequency of the ions in the battery, well congratulations, because I have never seen anything like that ever, after trying hundreds of times, it's pointless.

In reality all that had to be done in that motor/generator is simply have a 555 timer or just one mechanical switch on the shaft to dump the capacitor back to the same battery running everything, and that's it. If there is more power being generated than what the motor consumes, then the battery will charge up. That particular device didn't have to have the motor disconnected from the battery as it was receiving back a power pulse from the energizer. Not only that, but there were no rectifying diodes on those coils if you go back and look carefully at his book "Free Energy Generator". There was only a variable capacitor, so the timing would be much more difficult to obtain,

Bedini's claim was that the lead ions inside of the lead acid battery could be slammed with a high voltage from a capacitor to oscillate the ions. So because of the oscillating ions this would draw in current from the ambient environment. I'm sorry this is a far fetched theory, and has never worked for me and a lot of others. Bedini made no mention of what the purpose of the capacitor was in that diagram in his book. What he forgot to mention was it's not only high voltage coming out of that capacitor, but it is high current as well! He forgot to mention that the current does indeed come from the capacitor.

The capacitor is a high voltage device and is like a lightning holder of sorts. It is very similar to a battery, in that it holds voltage in between it's plates as a static field, with very little current, but guess what? When that high voltage is released, there is a huge voltage drop, just like a battery when a battery is discharged, it's voltage lowers as we draw current from it. So the huge voltage drop in the capacitor leads to a huge CURRENT rise out of the capacitor. And so this is a much more logical approach as to where the current actually comes from.

It's real simple. For instance if you're on your cell phone at the exact same time that you are charging it, it will charge up at the same time that you are using it. Plain and simple. If you are generating more energy than what is being consumed, you will get a battery that charges itself, not because you are oscillating ions in a battery. What a gimmick that was.

The ONLY reason I can see for using a switch like that to disconnect the battery from the motor is to conserve battery power, not to cause ions to slingshot into oscillation. Even disconnecting power from a battery will cause the rotor to slow down a little bit, even if you manage to eradicate the Lenz's Law drag completely, the rotor will still slow down slightly just because it was temporarily disconnected from the battery. So by the time it reconnects it, the current draw will have gone up and the rotor will have to spin back up to it's highest momentum. I do have to say I believe Bedini was right in having plenty of mass in the so called fly-wheel, which I am just calling a rotor. In that way momentum can be maintained and the rotor will have a harder time slowing down.

So in essence, the flip flop is used here for three things. A) To get the power separated out and away from the power wire and switching circuitry, but only if using a motor coil with only one single winding. This then is used to send power back to the one and only battery. B) The consequence of this is the advantage of conserving battery power in intervals or intermittently. C) When the motor is disconnected from the battery so that the battery can receive back a pulse of current from the high voltage stored in the capacitor, the motor coils then become generator coils! So then it is necessary to have a full wave bridge rectifier, so when that motor coil does become a generator coil, then all possible power can be harnessed.

So here's the sequence: The flip flop disconnects the motor from the battery, conserving power, while simultaneously receiving a power pulse not only from what the capacitor stored from the generator coils when it was connected but now from all coils including the motor coil that has been shut off and now is a generator coil. All AC is then rectified from motor and generator coils with two full wave bridge rectifiers, one to catch the collaspsing field when during the pulse off phase of the motor coil itself, and to also rectify AC when it becomes a generator, and another one connected to all other generator coils.

This is how you would hook up a motor and generator to each side of the flip flop circuit.


  1. Your videos are great!!!!! I have learned alot from your videos especially the effects of shorting the coil and collapsing effect of magnetic field...I was reading this article and notice a link that didn't work...Rectified Tuned LC Tank Circuit For Energy Recovery...Is that schematic still available or is that circuit included down at the bottomed of the article...Please email me any info, parts lists, or kits that you may offer...vickjarrett@outlook.com
    Thanks for all your hard work

  2. Hi, the "Rectified Tuned LC Tank Circuit For Energy Recovery" is actually included here on the bottom of this page. This is one of my original articles and the original site had the Recovery Power Circuit link going to the Rectified Tuned LC Tank Circuit For Energy Recovery Image, which IS the Recovery Power Circuit portrayed as a kind of flip flop circuit labeled as "Free Energy Control Circuit" that used to go to a separate page, while this site includes everything all on one page, and both circuits are basically the same thing.

    Essentially, everything starting from the Free Energy Control Circuit image found on this page and below is what used to be on that separate page, but not anymore, as it is all right here.

  3. do you want to massproduce the magnetic shock absorber.
    I can help you! goraarti@gmail.com

  4. Thanks for the great information!
    I don't know much about electronics, so think of things in mechanical terms..
    I am building an Adams motor/generator and so far have the motor working well enough and even manage to get BEMF from the drive coil into a cap. My question is about the flip-flop circuit.. as I don't see why it is needed when the motor is pulsed on and off anyway... Why can't the cap feed the source battery while it is in between pulses? I made a reed switch from my daughters hairclip since the small reed switches I bought all stuck and burned out. Another reed switch in the right spot could pulse the cap to the source battery.. But would it only charge the battery when it's voltage was higher than the battery voltage? Also I charged the cap to 100 volts from BEMF using 12 volt battery, but when I tried to run the motor from the cap it didn't work and the cap was down to 1 volt, so obviously no amps in the cap.. So will that even charge the battery?

  5. Thanks for sharing this information.



Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Does a Motor really Consume Energy?

Power Multiplication

Please Subscribe to my debunkified Youtube Channel